Add older version(s) of rocksdb #77
Conversation
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
|
Hi @tedil, would 8.11.4 work for you? It seems the latest major version 8. https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/tags?after=v9.1.1 |
I suppose so, though the latest mentioned rocksdb version for rust-rocksdb is 8.10.0, see https://github.com/rust-rocksdb/rust-rocksdb/releases/tag/v0.22.0 |
|
Good to know. Let's add the 8.10.x branch for now and consider upgrading or replacing it with 8.11.x if necessary in the future. |
|
It seems a354eab could be a good base commit. |
As far as I know, rocksdb occasionally has API changes between minor versions.
Since I use rust bindings to rocksdb (i.e. rust-rocksdb) in multiple projects for which I want to build conda packages, and since building rocksdb from scratch in the (bioconda) CI usually times out / exceeds resource usage, I'd like to link against pre-built rocksdb instead. For that to work, however, the versions of rocksdb and rust-rocksdb need to be compatible.
The newest 8.x release of rocksdb available from conda-forge is 8.5.3; whereas rust-rocksdb is currently okay with >=8.9.1.
I'd therefore be happy to somehow get a build of rocksdb 8.9.1 (or 8.10.x).
This PR should not be merged to main, but rather to a separate, yet-to-be-created branch ("8.x", I guess).
P.S.: I had to introduce a change to be able to submit a draft PR, which is basically an
exit 1in the build script to avoid accidentally processing/merging/triggering stuff.See also bioconda/bioconda-recipes#51210
cc @mbargull